The law and economics of development focuses its attention on the effects that well-functioning legal and judicial systems have on economic efficiency and development. Adam Smith states in his Lectures on Jurisprudence that a factor that "greatly retarded commerce was the imperfection of the law and the uncertainty in its application" (Smith, 528). Entrenched corrupt practices within the public sector (i.e., official systemic corruption) hamper the clear definition and enforcement of laws, and therefore, as Smith (1978) stated, commerce is impeded.
Systemic corruption within the public sector can be defined as the systematic use of public office for private benefit that results in a reduction in the quality or availability of public goods and services (Buscaglia 1997a). In these cases, corruption is systemic when a government agency only supplies a public good or service if an otherwise unwilling transfer of wealth takes place from an individual or firm to the public sector through bribery, extortion, fraud, or embezzlement.
Rose-Ackerman (1997, 5) states that "widespread corruption is a symptom that the state is functioning poorly." In fact, the entrenched characteristic of official corrupt practices is rooted in the abuse of market or organizational power by public sector officials 2%.
Related Online Articles:
- INDO - US Nuclear Deal
- It's Ram today and may be Gandhi tomorrow
- The Saga of Kashmir
- Corruption is an economic lubricant and hence may not be all that bad
- Amarnath Land Controversy
- Education In India
- Has the time come to eradicate the nuclear weapons
- Active Judiciary is a threat to democracy
- Reservation in Educational Institutions
- Article 49~0 of the constitution
No comment yet. Be the first to post a comment.